Jump to content


Photo

The Limit of Throwing Weapons


  • Please log in to reply
156 replies to this topic

Poll: The Limit of Throwing Weapons (295 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you want the limit of throwing weapons to be increased?

  1. Increase the base limit of throwing weapons to 2. (64 votes [21.69%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.69%

  2. Allow specialized throwers to carry more bags of missiles. (89 votes [30.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.17%

  3. Do not change the limit of throwing weapons. (89 votes [30.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.17%

  4. Do not change the limit but increase the ammo. (52 votes [17.63%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.63%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#101 Welsh_Lad, i am alive ish

Welsh_Lad
  • Member of Korpi
  • 3342 posts
  • 36546 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 13:13

Warband does not agree as he did not die from it.




Miss

#102 Dawlish, Un-Officially retired

Dawlish
  • Member of Korpi
  • 3405 posts
  • 63751 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 13:21

You have forced my hand and now I must smite you down with a Webster's definition.

 

miss1

mɪs/Submit

verb

1.

fail to hit, reach, or come into contact with (something aimed at).

 

You are not prepared for this argument, turn back while you can!


#103 MrZeppo, I literally died of AFKing

MrZeppo
  • Member of CWs
  • 671 posts
  • 16990 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 13:59

You have forced my hand and now I must smite you down with a Webster's definition.

miss1
mɪs/Submit
verb
1.
fail to hit, reach, or come into contact with (something aimed at).

You are not prepared for this argument, turn back while you can!

He failed to come in contact with his nice forhead m9 which he most likely aimed for and that means he missed, ha!

Edited by MrZeppo, 08 December 2014 - 15:39.


#104 Dinkywinky, Sandorra you're a damn pleb. Go eat Dog shit with Paprica.

Dinkywinky
  • Member of Akai
  • 1190 posts
  • 18444 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 14:44

He sliced the guys chin... so he obviously hit him... come on guys dont go full retard...

#105 MrZeppo, I literally died of AFKing

MrZeppo
  • Member of CWs
  • 671 posts
  • 16990 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 15:44

If you aim to shoot a football into the top right corner of the goal but instead shoots it into the center then that's a miss, alteast according to what Dawlish wrote.

And I just find it kind of hard to believe he aimed for his cheek when he could have aimed for a lethal point. So yes, he hit him but he still missed his target(probably).

Get Shrecked.

 

edit:oh and also, nope, I'm not letting this go

 

edit2:shit, this argument is so damn pointless :D

Edited by MrZeppo, 08 December 2014 - 15:46.


#106 Welsh_Lad, i am alive ish

Welsh_Lad
  • Member of Korpi
  • 3342 posts
  • 36546 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 15:49

^^^

#107 Dinkywinky, Sandorra you're a damn pleb. Go eat Dog shit with Paprica.

Dinkywinky
  • Member of Akai
  • 1190 posts
  • 18444 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 17:43

When I shoot a bow I aim a little to the right, does that mean every time the arrow hits somebody its a miss?
 


#108 MrZeppo, I literally died of AFKing

MrZeppo
  • Member of CWs
  • 671 posts
  • 16990 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 19:29

When I shoot a bow I aim a little to the right, does that mean every time the arrow hits somebody its a miss?
 

I'm not even going to bother answearing that.

Edited by MrZeppo, 08 December 2014 - 19:29.


#109 Dinkywinky, Sandorra you're a damn pleb. Go eat Dog shit with Paprica.

Dinkywinky
  • Member of Akai
  • 1190 posts
  • 18444 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 20:01

I'm just following your logic...


#110 Dawlish, Un-Officially retired

Dawlish
  • Member of Korpi
  • 3405 posts
  • 63751 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 20:12

If you aim to shoot a football into the top right corner of the goal but instead shoots it into the center then that's a miss, alteast according to what Dawlish wrote.

 

That's such a moot point, the top left of the goal is still part of the goal, so if you are targeting the top left of the goal you are still targeting the goal itself as an object. In football they don't go 'oh bloody hell I missed, it's gone in the left of the net when I aimed for the middle, we better not count that one'.


#111 wangchan, The Face of Mercenaries

wangchan
  • Member of SKoD
  • 3894 posts
  • 10729 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 20:28

guys....Dawlish said "when they add spears to mercenaries"....

 

Hitting someone in the chin/mouth with a ranged weapon in mercenaries = death........

 

so it is confirmed, when the throwing spear is added to the mod, dawlish will throw it into someones mouth, giving him a headshot kill.

Edited by wangchan, 08 December 2014 - 20:29.


#112 Katniss, Whats this then, eh?

Katniss
  • Member of Crusade
  • 522 posts
  • 14776 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 21:15

Its pointless to argue with Dawlish anyway, you´ll get depressed with time 


#113 MrZeppo, I literally died of AFKing

MrZeppo
  • Member of CWs
  • 671 posts
  • 16990 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 21:46

That's such a moot point, the top left of the goal is still part of the goal, so if you are targeting the top left of the goal you are still targeting the goal itself as an object. In football they don't go 'oh bloody hell I missed, it's gone in the left of the net when I aimed for the middle, we better not count that one'.

Well we're not really talking about a goal though, that was just the first thing that popped into my head, even so I do think I made my point clear enough.

 

And this is where I'll end this shit because I can already feel the depression seeping into me.

 

I just need to point out though before I go that when you posted the wiki quote to prove yourself right you actually proved yourself wrong which was fani.


#114 Blackhood, Mildly amusing, at most.

Blackhood
  • Member of Anottra
  • 124 posts
  • 9164 kills

Posted 08 December 2014 - 22:19

when you posted the wiki quote to prove yourself right you actually proved yourself wrong which was fani.

 

  • Dawlish likes this

#115 Anchor_The_Mean

Anchor_The_Mean
  • Member of Crusade
  • 340 posts
  • 35772 kills

Posted 10 December 2014 - 00:39

Always wondered when I see players with throwing weapons, whether or not they're simply using them because they have free inventory space, or because they have invested points some in throwing skills. I don't really see how you can give feedback on the balance of throwing weapons if the former applies to you, especially if you complain about them being underpowered (what do you expect). 

Edited by Anchor_The_Mean, 10 December 2014 - 09:58.

  • Bloedwoud likes this

#116 wangchan, The Face of Mercenaries

wangchan
  • Member of SKoD
  • 3894 posts
  • 10729 kills

Posted 10 December 2014 - 22:25

Lol anchor the bean


#117 Sir Toresky, Nemo demittat bandum et inimicos seque!

Sir Toresky
  • Member of Dayne
  • 29 posts
  • 11876 kills

Posted 16 December 2014 - 18:28

IMO increase the limit to 2, or don't change anything.


#118 wangchan, The Face of Mercenaries

wangchan
  • Member of SKoD
  • 3894 posts
  • 10729 kills

Posted 17 December 2014 - 19:13

This would mean allowing the perk to carry 3 bags of ammo...this is good imo eughueh
 
Besides bro, if my throwing spear proposal is added to the mod, nobody will care about throwing ammo, cos one spear will be all we need uheguheuheuh

#119 Fant0m, Ze Pr0 Glitcher

Fant0m
  • Member of RoseCroix
  • 146 posts
  • 11945 kills

Posted 14 January 2015 - 10:35

What do you think about the idea of increasing the number of throwing weapons you can take to battle? We could allow all players to carry 2 bags of missiles and the perk would allow to carry 3 bags. Or we could keep the current base limit but allow throwers to increase it to 3 by training the perk.

And why not add supply boxes where you can refund ammos for like 50g (or free) 


#120 wangchan, The Face of Mercenaries

wangchan
  • Member of SKoD
  • 3894 posts
  • 10729 kills

Posted 14 January 2015 - 14:35

increase throwing weapon limit





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users