Jump to content


Photo

Archer Poll


  • Please log in to reply
189 replies to this topic

Poll: Archer balance poll (414 member(s) have cast votes)

What is your opinion of the current archer class?

  1. Archers are too powerful at the moment. (136 votes [32.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 32.85%

  2. Archers are underpowered. (47 votes [11.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.35%

  3. Archers are too powerful on certain maps and game-modes. (111 votes [26.81%])

    Percentage of vote: 26.81%

  4. Archers are fine the way they are. (120 votes [28.99%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.99%

Do you think a weak 0 skill shield would be helpful?

  1. Yes. (267 votes [64.49%])

    Percentage of vote: 64.49%

  2. No. (147 votes [35.51%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.51%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#81 sandorra, The God of (In)Justice

sandorra
  • Member of Korpi
  • 8096 posts
  • 26469 kills

Posted 27 June 2014 - 05:47

It would also balance the game. Besides, if we want to talk about restrictions, there's already strength requirements and skill requirements. You can't use crossbows, bows, shields or horses without specific skills. Nor can you use armour above your strength.
Sometimes, restrictions are the best way to balance everything.

#82 Jepekula

Jepekula
  • Member of Korpi
  • 1726 posts
  • 10732 kills

Posted 27 June 2014 - 11:52

Homer should (as in, a reason to do it) restrict 2h/polearms from archers, since it would make classes more unique and distinct.


#83 NeToMaN, *Insert member title here*

NeToMaN
  • 364 posts
  • 15417 kills

Posted 27 June 2014 - 15:47

Or disable zoom ^^

#84 knez, Inactive, for good this time.

knez
  • Member of Korpi
  • 2909 posts
  • 30754 kills

Posted 27 June 2014 - 19:38

Disable zoom ?

No thanks,that will make archers useless on long distances


#85 Jepekula

Jepekula
  • Member of Korpi
  • 1726 posts
  • 10732 kills

Posted 27 June 2014 - 19:39

I, as an infantryman, really like the zoom. Please do not remove it.


#86 NeToMaN, *Insert member title here*

NeToMaN
  • 364 posts
  • 15417 kills

Posted 27 June 2014 - 21:38

Come on guys, it was joke, pesonally I think that archers should stay as they are, the only thing that is bad, is shitload of players playing as archers, it is easy to beat 4 infs alone on Mercs, but agaist 4 archers crossfireing you - much harder, even as an experienced inf.

#87 Jepekula

Jepekula
  • Member of Korpi
  • 1726 posts
  • 10732 kills

Posted 27 June 2014 - 21:52

Get a four shields.

  • Delocin likes this

#88 The_Bear_Jew, I don't care about ur meaningless words, megamen.

The_Bear_Jew
  • 164 posts
  • 23 kills

Posted 28 June 2014 - 08:38

We should have armor only build out of shields. #fucknubchers c:


#89 knez, Inactive, for good this time.

knez
  • Member of Korpi
  • 2909 posts
  • 30754 kills

Posted 30 June 2014 - 11:20

Thing that should be donned is to disable archery with 2h/polearms in inventory.Its realy annoying to see archer that't using 2hs or polearm


#90 Surkan, TheGodlyDutch, klan #IGOR

Surkan
  • Member of Emperium
  • 697 posts
  • 13114 kills

Posted 30 June 2014 - 13:13

How is it logical that an archer can't use a 2h or polearm?


#91 Gazz, fuck christ oy

Gazz
  • Member of Korpi
  • 2620 posts
  • 26497 kills

Posted 30 June 2014 - 15:08

Balance reasons.

  • knez likes this

#92 Surkan, TheGodlyDutch, klan #IGOR

Surkan
  • Member of Emperium
  • 697 posts
  • 13114 kills

Posted 30 June 2014 - 23:47

Why not adapt? A shielder can own any 2h and archer.


#93 Gazz, fuck christ oy

Gazz
  • Member of Korpi
  • 2620 posts
  • 26497 kills

Posted 01 July 2014 - 06:16

Any class can own any class, I fail to see what's your point.


#94 knez, Inactive, for good this time.

knez
  • Member of Korpi
  • 2909 posts
  • 30754 kills

Posted 01 July 2014 - 13:35

Why not adapt? A shielder can own any 2h and archer.

 

Goddamn is it normal to see archer carrying 2hs or some crazy long polearm ?


#95 Jepekula

Jepekula
  • Member of Korpi
  • 1726 posts
  • 10732 kills

Posted 01 July 2014 - 13:50

In Mercenaries, yes it is.

Archers should not have 2h or polearms, or atleast use them effectively, because they should be, you know, ranged, not melee. Them having better melee weaponry than a dedicated shielder is stupid.


#96 Surkan, TheGodlyDutch, klan #IGOR

Surkan
  • Member of Emperium
  • 697 posts
  • 13114 kills

Posted 01 July 2014 - 15:49

Maybe it is a 2hander with a bow? What do you know?

  • Faravin likes this

#97 knez, Inactive, for good this time.

knez
  • Member of Korpi
  • 2909 posts
  • 30754 kills

Posted 01 July 2014 - 18:25

Maybe it is a 2hander with a bow? What do you know?

 

And spearman with a bow ?


#98 SkyTime, 00101111 00101111 01100100 01100001 01100010 00101111 00101111

SkyTime
  • Member of Korpi
  • 7455 posts
  • 22789 kills

Posted 02 July 2014 - 17:37

Or a moron with excellent ranged capability whipping out a bastard sword, GLB, GLA, great sword or a fucking claymore when they get into melee? I don't think so.

 

Sure archers get a major penalty on their weapon proficiencies in 2h or polearm but I don't think that's the point. Just having a weapon that oneshots half the players is enough. Why would anyone use a 1h? Other weapons outclass them in every way possible. Same applies to shielders, the only advantage they have is that they don't get shot to shreds, admittedly that's a really big one.

Edited by SkyTime, 02 July 2014 - 17:38.


#99 Surkan, TheGodlyDutch, klan #IGOR

Surkan
  • Member of Emperium
  • 697 posts
  • 13114 kills

Posted 02 July 2014 - 23:52

1h actually wins any class. ggwp


#100 Gazz, fuck christ oy

Gazz
  • Member of Korpi
  • 2620 posts
  • 26497 kills

Posted 03 July 2014 - 07:33

So a shorter, less damage weapon that is usually slower thanks to how animations work unless you're hiltslashing wins any class?

 

 

 

??????????





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users